Extract Class Refactoring by analyzing class variables

Figure 6: Strongly related (SSM based) functional sets and similarities between them, Case Study I. Nodes represent set of closely related methods; weight of the edge between two nodes represents the average value of SSM among the methods of the corresponding sets. Non trivial sets are represented by smaller circles and are merged with trivial sets (bigger circles) of the same color.. Figure 11: SSM based graph, case study I, minCoupling = 0 – This is a graphical representation of the SSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods Figure 12: VSM based graph, case study I, minCoupling = 0 – This is a graphical representation of the VSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods Figure 13: SSM matrix representation, case study I, minCoupling = 0 – This is the matrix representation of the SSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods vi Figure 14: VSM matrix representation, case study I, minCoupling = 0 – This is the matrix representation of the VSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods Figure 15: SSM based graph, case study I, minCoupling = 0.72 – This is a graphical representation of the SSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods Figure 16: VSM based graph, case study I, minCoupling = 0.69 – This is a graphical representation of the VSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods Figure 17: SSM matrix representation, case study I, minCoupling = 0.72 – This is the matrix representation of the SSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods for the input class .. Figure 18: VSM matrix representation, case study I, minCoupling = 0.69 – This is the matrix representation of the VSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods for the input class .. Figure 19: SSM matrix representation, case study II, minCoupling = 0 – This is the matrix representation of the SSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods Figure 20: VSM matrix representation, case study II, minCoupling = 0 – This is the matrix representation of the VSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods Figure 22: VSM matrix representation, case study II, minCoupling = 0.78 – This is the matrix representation of the VSM based structural similarity between every pair of methods for the input class ..